Comments on: Sarah Palin: Redefining Feminism

By: billy tk

billy tk — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:10:42 +0000

Feminism is a scam. It is an attack on a set of values and belief system, not a single struggle for the so-called equality of women. That is why so many issues keeps on being dragged into the debate that has absolutely nothing to do with the so-called liberation of women. It is a secular humanist ideology tied in with belief systems such as Evolution and Atheism. Its purpose is the destruction of the traditional family. It is at war with morals as defined in classical religious views. It pretends to have a monopoly on fight for the rights of women, and use it at every and any opportunity to drag the rest of the ideology in as a package deal. It pretends that to be a Bible believer makes you automatically an enemy of women. It is the blatant exploitation of women to further a secular humanist ideology with no moral foundation in its war against a competing ideology under the auspices of fighting for women’s rights.
Sarah Palin is everything that this ideology fights against. She makes the other competing ideology look good – and exposes that you don’t need the sum total of their ideology to be a successful woman. In fact – she makes them look blatantly false – and the realization that what she stands for is so much more pure and true than what their ideology proposes sets of the alarm bells. She could sink the whole ideological package that is being towed in under the cover of so-called women’s rights.
For these feminazis it is the whole deal or nothing. You must be a liberal atheist with no moral values and a man hater to qualify as a feminist – or to be allowed to benefit from the scam. Sarah Palin is a Christian. She has a family. She is moral. She does not murder her unborn. Everything that they fight against. It has nothing to do with fighting for women. That is why they can not tolerate any of the other issues on its own even when it has to do with the service interval of your vehicle and nothing to do with the rights of a woman. See the scam for what it is and the real target that they are after. You have been hoodwinked.

By: billy tk

billy tk — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:01:49 +0000

Now let me see – who would I like to produce offspring with and share my life with:
- A beautiful, charming woman who does not murder the unborn, who can handle herself even in the hunting field, who can look after a family of five, who loves her husband and her children and who do not spit vitriolic comment at everyone who disagrees with her
or
- A man-hating abortionist who spends her time on fashion magazines, has lesbian tendencies, hates children, can’t even cook for herself, looks down on everyone else asif she is a gift to mankind and spits the most disgusting degrading bile at someone who dares disagree with their theories of liberal doctrines of faith and thinks that their ivy league qualifications somehow made them better than others, and who would rather have my daughters be the same kind of hateful spinsters rather than provide me with grand children

Easy to see why the liberal feminazi’s hate Sarah Palin. She is the real deal. Her very existence next to them makes them scared that everyone will see them for they really are. And their reactions confirms it.

By: ipastor

ipastor — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:09:11 +0000

Please make this woman your presidential candidate. I think she is ahead in the Republican straw polls, isn’t she? Not to mention, Hucka is not what he used to be.

By: Rita Callord

Rita Callord — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:50:22 +0000

Regina, you have taken one month to respond… By now, several indivuals are recommending this article: http://johnbrodigan.com/2009/11/27/sarah-palin-the-gloria-steinem-of-the-new-millenium/ You should be the one checking the facts if you are so incredulous about this piece. What can I say? Merry Crhistmas?

By: Regina

Regina — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:37:25 +0000

Huh? If I gave your article to my college-level students to analyze, they’d demand evidence for this sort of claim: “[Feminists] encourage, if not demand, that young women leave their stem families to pursue east-coast elite educations, urban experiences (goodbye pot roasts and Moose stew), six-figure salaries, and a respectable limit when it comes to children (less trouble, smaller carbon footprint!).” If this claim is correct, it shouldn’t be difficult to offer supporting evidence that proves it to be true. Unless you’re just preaching to the choir that already agrees with you here…

By: Maria Faberth

Maria Faberth — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:21:41 +0000

Preesi,… you are something… I have the feeling you belong to a different kind of website…
http://preesi.lefora.com/members/preesi/
Absolutely clueless about feminism, just as John Thunow pointed out, and a big talker, just like cjane99 rightly tells you… Please stop insulting our intelligence.

By: Juan Valderrama

Juan Valderrama — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:18:40 +0000

Preesi, cjane99´s comments are right on and to the point. You need a job. You insulted Palin and you have no arguments, just as John Thunow clearly showed. Get a life!

By: cjane99

cjane99 — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:04:52 +0000

Riiiiiight. Deny. deny, deny. The link is still there.
You seem to believe your enthusiasm for sex makes you special. I’ve got news for you. Lots of grown women with significant accomplishments also reeeeaaaaally enjoy sex. They work out, they look good, they have great relationships and great sex lives. It’s healthy to want to play and enjoy one’s sexuality. It’s inspiring to see healthy-looking women of all ages enjoying themselves and proud of the way they’ve taken care of themselves. I’m not sure where you get this idea that you are the only person in the world who believes that; I guess it just helps you to feel like you’re special. Which you are, but in a totally different way.

The deficit will never be paid off. Tax stuctures need to change. And you need a job.

By: cjane99

cjane99 — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:53:32 +0000

Obama did not come “out of nowhere,” btw. He’s been groomed for this position by the powerful Chicago thuggery that has quite comfortably found its way into the White House.

By: Preesi

Preesi — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:53:21 +0000

HAHAHA! there was NEVER any zucchini thing! that was the entire point, it was a JOKE!
I guess you just arent capable of HUMOR!

HAHAHAHAHA!!!

So do you think that women should wither away and die after having kids? Are they NEVER again allowed to be sexy and sexual and be proud of themselves?

Be careful how you answer! you will look awfully sexist and anti woman and perhaps AGEIST too.
Thats okay though, most Conservatives are scared to death of SEXUAL WOMEN and especially womens POWER.

So lets get this straight, Julie Andrews after having her 3 kids, and Sophia Loren and Demi Moore should NEVER again show off their bodies nor be sexy or sensual after having kids and reaching their 40s?
HAHAHAHA! Cougars rule!
I do wonder where and how Palin got Trig if she was supposed to die sexually after reaching 40! HAHAHA!

Conservatives kill me with their anti sex, anti women hatred!

A gnat can debate Sarah Palin.

So let me get this straight, Sarah says we have to lower taxes? Is that right? So how are we going to support this country or pay for things or reduce the deficit if we KEEP reducing taxes? How are we going to pay China back?

Why not quit the personal and sexual attacks and debate like an adult. They make you look very immature as well as sexist.