Washington Archdiocese Regrets the DC Vote Legalizing “Same-Sex Marriage”
|
Print This Post
The Washington, DC, City Council voted this week to redefine “marriage” by legalizing “same-sex marriage” in the nation’s capital, handing supporters a victory after recent defeats in Maine, New York, and New Jersey.
Mayor Adrian Fenty has promised to sign the bill, which passed 11-2, and gay couples could begin “marrying” as early as March. The vote was the second of two required on the measure, which was first introduced nearly a year ago.
Congress, which has final say over Washington’s laws, could reject it, but Democratic leaders have suggested they are reluctant to do so.
The bill had overwhelming support among council members and was expected to pass, though opponents have vowed to try to get Congress or voters to overturn it.
The Washington Archdiocese expressed regret after this was approved despite church opposition and without protecting religious freedom. “Since this legislation was first introduced in October, the Archdiocese of Washington opposed the redefinition of marriage based on the core teaching of the Catholic Church that the complementarity of man and woman is intrinsic to the definition of marriage,” said an archdiocesan statement Dec. 15.
However, the archdiocese said that because “the City Council was committed to legalizing same-sex marriages,” it had advocated for a bill that would balance that action with protecting religious freedom. The archdiocesan statement noted that the district now joins a handful of states where legislatures or courts “have redefined marriage to include persons of the same sex.” The Washington Archdiocese opposed any effort to redefine marriage as other than that between a man and a woman.
The Catholic Church teaches that marriage is a permanent union between one man and one woman. But archdiocesan officials also argued that the bill would restrict the free exercise of religion and would affect the ability of its Catholic Charities agency to work with the city in serving the poor. The Dec. 15 archdiocesan statement said the archdiocese and Catholic Charities “are deeply committed to serving those in need, regardless of race, creed, gender, ethnic origin or sexual orientation. This commitment is integral to our Catholic faith and will remain unchanged into the future.”
“Religious organizations have long been eligible to provide social services in our nation’s capital and have not been excluded simply because of their religious character,” the statement said. “This is because the choice of provider has focused on the ability to deliver services effectively and efficiently.” “We are committed to serving the needs of the poor and look forward to working in partnership with the District of Columbia consistent with the mission of the Catholic Church,” it said.
As we already informed in The Americano, efforts to legalize same-sex marriage also are under way in New Jersey. The New Jersey bishops, along with a large coalition of rabbis and evangelical and Baptist ministers, have strongly voiced the position that marriage can only be defined as a union between one man and one woman.
The Americano / Agencies
Related posts:
- U.S. and Mexican Catholic Bishops: “Gay unions are not marriages or families.” Auxiliary Bishop Antonio Lerma Nolasco of Mexico City said...
- New Jersey Senate ready to vote on a same-sex marriage bill tomorrow The New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee approved a bill...
- Pope Names Hispanic Archbishop Successor to LA Cardinal Pope Benedict XVI named San Antonio’s Archbishop Jose Gomez the...
- New Jersey same-sex marriage vote put off Proponents of same-sex “marriage” began 2009 with a string...
- Catholics Against Same-Sex Marriage The Catechism of the Catholic Church clearly states that...





Not as sorry as the Homeless will be once YOU, Catholic Church of DC, stop feeding them (as you have stated) using public funds, over this very same issue. Oh well, your reward will be in heaven I suppose.
you really have a lack of knowledge about the issue, but you write whatever comes to mind.
Are you going to say something your self or just point out how much you don’t like my postings?
The Catholic Church follows the Doctrine of the Catholic Church and stays on principle. Same sex marriage is not accepted by the Catholic Church. That is all. If you do not like Catholicism, do not be a Catholic but please respect their ideas as they respect yours.
Why should I respect their ideas when they try to block equal rights because of them?
I could care less what the Archdiocese thinks. If they have a problem with same-sex marriage, that’s fine. They have the right to be anti-whatever, and if they don’t want to perform any, they don’t have to. But once one segment of the population starts setting the rules for everyone, you have a serious assault on freedom.
A ver enteradillo Pastor, de qué tema quieres hablar y discutir?
buscate una novia o un perro, ok… si algo de lo que escribi ESPECIFICAMENTE, en algun comentario, aqui o halla no te gusta, dime para que te diga por que tu estas equivocado, si es que estas equivocado, si tu quieres apoyar las tonterias que se escriben aqui o halla, haslo ya veras my respuesta en reply.
Fijate como lo hacen en los lugares que ustedes quieren imitar, que bien que los quieran imitar por que tiene muchas cosas buenas que a ustedes les falta todavia.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/ipastor01?action=comments
A ver, ipastor, no te pongas nervioso que veo que ya empiezas a atacar personalmente con lo de la novia y un perro. Lo mismo tengo ya novio y un gato. Pero como veo que no quieres discutir de verdad sobre ningún tema, lo que sí te pido es que cuando escribas en español, al menos hagas por escribirlo bien, que mira que te lo han dicho aquí varias veces ya. No es “halla”, sino “allá”. Y no es “haslo”, sino hazlo. En cuanto a discutir de temas, ya te digo que saques uno y comentamos. Entretanto, sigue leyendo la gramática de Bello en tus ratos libres, que parece que son muchos.