By George Handlery. It is not a towering intellectual challenge to agree with a popular general principle. A bit more difficult is to formulate one for oneself and for the rest of mankind. The test of any moral rectitude expressed by the principle comes after its formulation. It happens when, unexpectedly, a collision between the abstract rule and personal commitments and identifications arise. An aspect of the problem is expressed by a clever adage. It holds that it is easier to love mankind than to get along with the neighbor. A current example of holding on to a principle one its application effects “one of us” negatively is provided by some prominent congressmen. Originally, prior to encountering temptations, they were loudly for honesty in politics mainly because others were to be judged. The same people are now facing investigation for corruption wrapped in a fancy term. It is notable that regardless of the evidence, their party and some people that are professionally eminent, rally doggedly to their defense.












